During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
If you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.。关于这个话题，旺商聊官方下载提供了深入分析
Ahrefs' domain comparison tool lets you compare up to，推荐阅读旺商聊官方下载获取更多信息
工具的选择也很重要，但不应该让工具主导流程。。搜狗输入法2026对此有专业解读
华纳兄弟此前表示，Netflix有四个工作日提出修改后的报价，供华纳兄弟董事会判断该报价能否与派拉蒙的最新出价相匹配。派拉蒙寻求整体收购华纳兄弟，而Netflix的协议则针对华纳兄弟的电影电视工作室以及HBO Max流媒体服务。